Abstract
Index
Terms— AC- Alternating Current, DC- Direct Current, EVSE- Electric Vehicle Supply
Equipment, IC-CPD- In Cord-Control and Protection Device.
1. Introduction
In present day, there is huge issue of Green House gases because of fuels used by the vehicles. There are lots of climate changes happening and urban air quality is getting worse
for which the overuse of
crude oils is the main cause. The alternate source of energy to run the vehicles can possibly reduce the
pollution levels; hydrogen and
electricity are two of
them. Without proper infrastructure development none of the alternate fueled vehicles would
work. There is need of standardization of charging network and infrastructure.
Most of the vehicles used in the automotive industry
are Internal Combustion Engine (ICE). These use gas
as the mode to produce
power to run the vehicle.
Petrol, diesel and CNG are commonly used energy sources. The depleting natural
resources of gas, increasing price and continuously increasing mobile pollution due to ICE vehicles has led to think about the other power sources
for automotive industry.
The various kind of alternate energy sources are being worked upon. Electricity and hydrogen are two of them. For the hydrogen
powered vehicle, energy is converted is converted
into electricity in the vehicle itself and then used through energy
storage devices. In electricity run vehicles, electricity is stored directly
in the energy store devices
and such vehicles are known as Electric Vehicles (EV). In last one decade,
most of the automobile companies and governments all around the world have put lots of effort
to transform conventional ICE vehicle into alternate fueled vehicle. The prominently advantages are such
as: better energy conversion rate, lesser vehicular
noise, lower carbon and greenhouse gas emission, therefore
better air quality. Electric Vehicles (EVs) are widely
researched and implemented over Hydrogen fueled
vehicles. The EVs are mostly fueled by electricity produced by clean energy sources
which make them cost effective substitute for ICE
vehicles to step towards sustainable development. Most of the countries are targeting to lower the CO2 levels by
15-30% by 2030 and Net Zero Emission by 2050 which would help to achieve the
target of capping global warming by 1.5Co [1] – [3]. The number of EVs sold all around the world
increased by 41% by 2020, but due to pandemic
the sales decreased by 16% which are expected to increase soon [2] On the average, the 39% of new cars being
purchased are Electric Vehicle with Norway being the leader
all around the world. This paper is organized as follows: Section II
exhibits the classification of EVs,
which are divided into three types based on
of the source of energy used, which
are expected to work at different
three levels. Further the modes of EV charging are explained, followed
by types of charger connectors and vehicle socket
plugs [3] – [11].
II.
Classification of Electric
vehicles
It is not necessarily that the vehicle
runs just on electricity or just on gas. It can run on either one
of the gas or electricity or both. Depending upon the designer and usage
different type of EVs are explained.
A.
Battery Electric
Vehicles (BEV)
Battery Electric vehicles
depend totally upon the re- chargeable battery installed in the vehicles.
Battery can be recharged by plugging into the EVSE. As for the ICE vehicles
engine produces the power and runs the vehicle, in BEV battery is the powerhouse of the vehicle
where all the energy is stored and transferred to electric motor to run the vehicle.
Other major components of BEV are Battery, Electric
motor, Inverter, Drive train and Control module. The AC
power from EVSE is converted into DC to be stored in the battery. The
accelerator pedal sends the signal to control module to start the drive train.
Further, the vehicle electric motor is put into function. To run the electric
motor DC power is converted into AC using the inverter. The vehicle speed is
varied by the driver by pressing or releasing the accelerator and breaks.
Control module is informed about the same which controls the frequency of AC
power which controls the electric motor and finally the speed the vehicle. There are a lot of advantages of EV. EVs are easy to drive just as similar as automatic ICE vehicle [6], [12]. There is almost
negligible sound when EV is used
therefore, no noise pollution. There are no
gases emitted from EV while
in run, thus no environmental pollution too. Electricity is relatively cheaper
than petrol and diesel which saves money. The wear and tear is way less than ICE vehicle, thus another way to save little money. It can also be charged
at home. Where there are so many advantages of EV, there are few of the disadvantages too, the electric vehicles are expensive to buy. The charging infrastructure is not expanded
well therefore not enough charging points. The drive range is EV is limited and cannot travel longer distance in one charge. It needs frequent
charging on longer runs. The charging
time of EV is way much higher than refueling
ICE vehicle, which is a lot more time consuming
[13] – [15]. The basic
architecture of BEV is shown in Fig 1(a).
B. Hybrid
Electric Vehicle (HEV)
A hybrid electric vehicle is a type of hybrid vehicle that combines a conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) system with an electric propulsion system (electric vehicle drive train). Modern HEVs make use of efficiency improving technologies such as regenerative brakes which convert kinetic energy into electric energy, which is stored in a battery or super capacitor. HEVs can have both gas-powered engine and electric motor. Generally Braking energy is lost in the form of heat in the brake pads and rotors. But in HEV, energy of battery is charged through regenerative braking system. Regular HEV cannot plug into grid to recharge. In HEV the vehicle when start running from vault, up to almost 100 meters or until the vehicle attains the speed around 20-30 kmph, it runs on electric motor using battery as power source and thereafter, engine is used. This saves a least little of the gas which was supposed to use to run the vehicle originally. The hybrid type of electric vehicle has lots if advantages such as HEV have superior miles per gram average than regular gas automobiles. Less of harmful chemical gases are released and these are relatively environment friendly. There is selection of power settings, varying from eco to power for maximum performance. Along with advantages, there are a few disadvantages as higher purchasing cost. The hybrid technology is complex to be manufactured and monitored. Overall Fuel economy on the roads or highways is not much. As the cost of vehicle increases so does insurance rate. Hybrid fuel efficiency decreases in cold weather [15] – [20]. The basic architecture of HEV is shown in Fig 1(b).
C. Plug-in
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
(PHEV)
Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles (PHEVs) are becoming
so popular because it required
fewer amounts of fuels and Crude-oil as compared with normal vehicles.
It helps to reduce the Fossil- Fuels &Crude-Oils. It helps financially to the people.[16] – [21] This
pioneering modeling and design study established the characteristics and compared well-to-wheel energy use, carbon dioxide emissions and costs of
conventional ICE, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles for
simulated driving cycles. Compared to the Conventional and Hybrid-Vehicles the Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles requires
less consumption Fuels & Crude-Oils. This Plug-In Hybrid
Vehicles produce less amount of
emission. It reduces
the amount of carbon which will help for
Green House gases which will be help to Atmosphere. The different types
of EVs’ architectures are shown on figure
[18] – [23]. The basic architecture of PHEV is shown in Fig 1(c). The energy is stored in the storage device which is received in the form of electricity. Usually, the electricity source is the electric grid. From the grid, a connection is made to the EV to transfer the energy. The device used for connection is EV Charger. The charger
converts the alternating current energy to direct current to be stored
in the battery or other storage device.
The energy stored in the device is provided
to the motor to run the
vehicle along with operating vehicle’s other operating systems. The energy storage
device or battery
is one of the main parts of the EVs, thus the EV charger plays a vital role in the EV technology. EV battery chargers
are divided into two categories: On-board (fitted in the electric
Vehicle) and off-board (fixed
at a location).
III. Electric Vehicle
Supply Equipment (EVSE)
For any EV to get charged three
functions must be performed. First one is mechanical and other two are electrical. Mechanical function is to connect
the EV to Electric Vehicle
Supply Equipment which is performed
by the user [22], [23]. Another two functions are electrical; the first electrical function is to rectify the signal and second process is to control and regulate the supply voltage as per the battery charging capacity characters
The process of charging
is combination of two processes-
charging and termination. The charger needs to perform three basic key functions: a. Charging- getting
the electricity to battery to charge it, b. Stabilizing- keeping the charge rate optimized, c. Terminating- deciding
when to stop the charging
process. To decide what kind of charger is needed by the vehicle,
the manufacturer needs to understand the different technical
parts
and the power topologies [7].
A. Different EV charging methods
The EV user needs to charge
the EV to reuse the vehicle after the battery
drainage. The most used way is charging
the battery and other option
is to swap the discharged battery
with charged battery. To charge
the battery when connected to EV, the charging socket
is connected to EV charging
system. Electric Vehicle
Charging System is the whole system which is required to stabilize and electric energy from alternating
current, constant voltage, and constant frequency supply network to the direct
current with variable
voltage and high current to charge battery.
To charge the battery the charger can connect to EV in two ways of
connection i.e., conduction and induction. As the word implies, by conduction
means direct contact. When using condition as method of charge the EV battery,
charge from electricity gets transferred to electric vehicle through
direct connection between
the provider and the
EV. Whereas induction mean no direct contact. In induction method of charging
the vehicle is not connected to charger through cable instead the charge is
transferred wirelessly. Inductive method works through electromagnetic
transmission of charge.
Currently, most preferred way to charge
is conductive charging as it is cheaper and more
efficient. Lot of research is going on for improvement of inductive charging as
it offers greater comfort for charging
the vehicle making
it preferable choice for
charging in electric mobility.
Both conductive and
inductive methods to charge, take long time to charge. Even with the fastest charger, the time taken to EV
is much more than refilling the fuel in the ICE vehicle. Closest in terms of
time consumption in refilling is the battery swapping. The EV is taken to the
battery station and the discharged battery is replaced with the charged
one. This is the
fastest way that can be done but even it has its drawbacks which will be discussed later.
The current is divided in two forms: Alternating
Current (AC) and Direct Current (DC). Throughout the world, energy is
transferred in the form of AC. All the homes and office
receive AC from electricity grid, so AC is readily
available. Therefore, AC can
be used to charge the EV easily too. Based on current, the EV charging
can be divided into two categories: Alternating Current (AC) and Direct
Current (DC)
In AC charging
the EV is supplied power
in the form of AC and
in DC charging the EV is charged through DC. The most used energy storage
device is battery. DC is needed to charge the battery which is ultimately stored in it. Battery cannot be charged directly with AC charger as batteries do not support
AC supply, so it needs
to be converted into DC somewhere prior to charging the battery. This is done at On-Board
Charger. DC charger directly provides DC to charge the battery using Off-Board charger.
The On-Board and Off-Board chargers
can be studied based on various features,
availability and charging
speeds. Different
charging levels in
reference to charging power
for the On-board
and Off-board chargers
are shown in fig. 3. The
On-board charger is one implemented in the EV, whereas the Off-Board Charger are direct charging
units for EVs placed outside of the EV. The on-board
charger is an AC to DC converter which when fed with AC from the AC supply
conditions the supply by converting
into DC and supplies it to the Battery Management System (BMS) of EV and Off-Board Charger are DC chargers
which directly interface
with BMS for charging the EV battery.
The on-board charger
has power conversions for different
power levels ranging
in between 3.3 kW and 22 kW. It can work on both one-phase and three-phase power supply. The power cannot be directly supplied
to on-board charger from the supply
unit as it may have some fluctuations or instability. To control the instability and fluctuations the charger control
unit is used.
The charger control
unit converts
the incoming power as per the requirements of the EV by detecting the feedback from the connection between EV and CCU [24] – [27].
Flow of charge from grid to battery pack in EV through EVSE using On-board
charger is shown
in fig. 4 (a). The
Off-Board Charger are also known
as fast chargers
and designed to transfer
higher range of power which is
ranged from 20 kWh to almost 200 kWh as of the developments till now.
The input required for Off-Board chargers is greater than supply available from three phase power supply thus are connected to grid directly. If the vehicles are to be charged only with Off- Board chargers, the weight of EV can be reduced by removing the On-Board Chargers from the machine. To make the EV charging easier from home or office charging sockets, On- board charger is one of the mandatory parts of the EV. Different charging levels are shown in reference to On-board and Off- board chargers in figure 3 [27], [28]. Flow of charge from grid to battery pack in EV through EVSE using Off-board charger is shown in fig. 4 (b).
A. Conductive Charging
These days most of the
charger operators along with automotive industry prefer condition as method to
charge the EV as it is cheaper and relatively efficient. In conductive charging the direct contact
is made between
the EV and supply unit. From a charging
station a connecting cable is connected
to charging unit which further charges the EV using charging cable. The
main drawback is that the connection must be done manually [26] – [28].
(i)
EV charging Levels
The EV charging levels are
decided based on power levels at the charging unit outlet. The EV charging
levels are divided
into three different categories [27], [28].
A level 1 EVSE is residential supply equipment which uses most
commonly available AC input of 120V with limited 10A to 12A current with charging capacity
of maximum 1.6 kW per hour. It takes 12 to 17 hours to charge a small battery
of 24 kWh capacities. 24 kWh batteries run about 180 to 200 km of range.
The output from the charger
is AC which goes into the on-board charger of EV from where the
supply is sent to charge the
batteries via BMS. Level 1 charger is the
slowest of all the chargers. Level
1 EVSE are most suitable
for PHEVs as they have smaller batteries
as compared to BEVs. Nissan Leaf is one of the most used BEV
which tends to charge using level 1 supply [5], [12], [28]. Architectural design of level 1 EVSE is shown
in fig. 5 (a).
A level 2 EVSE is little faster charger than level 1. The input used is 220V or 230V of AC supply. Level 2 can work at single phase and three phases. These can be used at 15A/16A electric socket from where 13A of current can be withdrawn thus making the charging capacity of slowest level 2 EVSE to be 3.3 kW per hour which would take around 7 hours to charge small battery of 24 kWh capacity. Level 2 EVSE is also gives out AC supply just like level 1 EVSE. The AC from Supply equipment goes to the input of EV and charges the battery after getting converted into DC by On-board charger placed at EV. The current rating for level 2 EVSE varies from 13A to 80A along with charging capacity ranging from 3.3 kWh to 20 kWh. The charger with 20 kWh capacities would be the fast one working at three phase AC supply. For a mid-range EV of 350 km to 380 km using 40 kWh batteries, the charger working at 6.6 kWh, or 7.2 kWh would take an overnight to fully charge the battery [27], [28]. Architectural design of level 2 EVSE is shown in fig. 5 (b).
A level 3 EVSE are
fast chargers and are generally
connected the electricity grid directly. The output capacity of level 3 can be as low as level 1 or level 2 EVSE i.e., 2 to 20 kWh and as high as 50 kWh. Chargers
with higher capacity
like 200 kWh are termed
as ultra-fast chargers. Even the slow level 3 charger
with 20 kWh capacities would charge up small battery
of 24 kWh in 1.2 hour. If the battery
capacity used in EV is to be increased, the regular level 1 and level 2 chargers are going to take longer
time to charge which can go up to days too so there is too much need of fast and efficient
charger[22], [28], [29].
All the EVs are no fast DC charger compatible, the compatibility depends upon so many aspects such as battery
design and configuration, BMS, charging port compatibility, etc. The fast DC chargers take around 20 minutes to charge empty to 80% of the
battery and after 80 %, it takes a long time therefore DC charging
is measured up to 80%. Architectural design of level 3 EVSE is shown
in fig. 5 (c). Comparative study of EV
Charging levels is shown
in fig. 6.
(ii) The EV Charging
Modes
For efficient performing of EVs all around the world, some standardization
is needed. For the same, safety communication
protocols between the charging station
and EVs have been standardized and called Charging
Modes. Four modes are defined as per the connection of EV to the power supply using the various
components. The components to be used are supply unit- home supply or grid supply,
extension cords, charger
control unit, on-board
or off-board charger.
The home supply can be single phase or three phase power supply coming out from standard 16A socket or specific socket
which can bear
the current above 16A. The charging modes are defined upon the basis
of combinations of some of the components explained above [9]. Different
modes of Electric
Vehicle charging are shown in fig. 7 along with explanation below:
Mode 1 charging: It
consists of only two components to make connection from supply unit to EV i.e., regular
home socket and cable. The EV can be charged comfortably anywhere effectively as it needs just a cable (with charging head and plug one on each side of charging
cable) and supply
socket. The maximum can be 16A at the maximum AC of 250 V in single phase or 480 V in three-phase.
It is the basic charging form the comfort of home using
standard available socket.
The electrical wiring must comply with the safety regulations such as have a proper
earthing system and have a circuit breaker
to prevent against overloading and protection against
current leakage [13], [14], [28] – [31].
In the mode 1 charging, EV is connected to 10 A regular home sockets using cable. It is the slowest mode to charge
an EV. There is no protection device
in case of fluctuations in the supply
or the circuit breakage in case of full charging of EV. This mode has been outlawed
in several countries.
Mode 2 Charging: In mode 2 charging, cable
from regular home socket connects to Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE)
which further charges the EV through on-board charger. The EVSE is a protection
device built in between the charging cable and portable in nature. The EVSE is
generally sold by the EV manufacturer along with the EV. The EVSE has in-built
residual current device which protects EV from over- current, over-heating, and
current leakage with device named In Cord –Control and Protection Device
(IC-CPD). IC-CPD also controls the fluctuations to protect the EV. EVSE gets
feedback signal from the EV regarding the connection, starts charging the EV
only when there is valid connection, earth protection, vehicle is plugged in
and vehicle has requested for power. The EVSE and EV communicate before
charging to establish the connection and start charging, during charging to
keep a check on charging and to stop the charging after fully charging to avoid
over charging and heating.
The mode 2 charging,
cables are moderately safe and are as per the required safety standards. The
EVSE is connected to single- phase 250 VAC at maximum of 32A but mostly used is
16A which is readily available at most of the houses and offices. The supply
outlet socket needs to have power and earth conductors to transfer power and
provide protection against electric shock [13], [14], [28] – [31].
Mode 3 Charging: Mode 3 charging is a conductive charging mode using AC charging station. EVSE is the control unit and is not portable. The power is higher than in mode 2 charging which can be connected to either of single phase or three phase power supply at maximum current can be 80A. When used to the maximum capacity the charging capacity reaches up to 22 kW per hour. It is the fastest mode to charge an EV using AC. The AC supply generally charges the EV up to 95 to 97% of battery capacity and is considered almost 100%.
The
mode 3 EVSE is not a portable
one but instead is wall mounted with high current supply mostly with the mains and charges the EV through
on-board charger. The Mode 3 EVSE communicates with EV just like mode 2 charging
EVSE but with better communication, judgment-, and charging
power. This is the only charging mode that meets all the electrical installation standards. This type of EVSE is optional to buy from
EV manufacturer or other EVSE manufacturer as it is an expensive product as compared
to mode 2 EVSE. Due to highpower capacity, it optimizes the charging time which is the good
enough reason to buy additional equipment to charge the personal EV [14] – [16], [28] – [31].
Mode 4 Charging:
Mode 4 Charging is an OFF-board
charger with DC connection charging
which is usually termed as fast DC charger. DC charger directly charges the battery using DC by-passing the on-board charger.
DC chargers are connected directly to the grid to receive
high power to charge the EV faster. The controls and protection are permanently mounted
along with the cable at the installation site. This kind of charger
is not suitable for home charging but instead for charging stations as it withdraws
high current and voltage which
may add load to the residential grid and ultimately may lead to power line
collapse in the area. The EVs have special charging
connectors to identify
the DC charging or AC charging which are
explained ahead [16], [28] – [31].
B. Inductive
Charging
Without the direct connection, the current can be transferred
between two objects using electromagnetic
field (EMF) and this process is known as induction. The same process
can be used to charge
the EVs too and is known as inductive charging.
It is done only at the charging
stations. From the electrical device the charge is transferred through inductive coupling
to EV to charge the EV battery
or run the EV. The
alternating EMF is produced at the induction coil at the inductive charging
station from the electric current
and the portable device (here EV)
receives power from the EMF using
coil and converts
it back into electric current
to charge the battery. The sender and receiver coils,
when come in proximity, from an electrical transformer. With the use of resonant
inductive coupling in inductive charging
system, the distances
between send and receive coil can also be increased. According to recent
research and developments, various materials are being
used such as silver-plated copper or aluminum to decrease the weight and
resistance of the resonant systems while using the movable transmission coil
[32] – [37]. The inductive charging is durable form of charging where the
connections are protected with low infection risk. As there are almost no cables needed,
the charging convenience and quality are maintained or even increased. Along with positive
qualities, there are few negative aspects
too such as, the speed of charging is lower, and it is expensive
way to charge the EVs. Building inductive charging stations is inconvenient at
this moment of time from station
when connected to socket. Connector: the charging head on
the cable towards EV which when connected to EV socket supplies the charge to EV to charge
it. EV Socket: on the EV
to which connector gets connected and supplies
the power. In Type 1, Type 2, CHAdeMO,
and CCS the connector on cable
side is female connector and, on the EV, socket is male [4], [5], [7],
[9]. The Socket
and connector correspond to each other i.e.,
the connector used on the charger side must be the corresponding as the socket
used in the EV.
A. Type 1 Connector
This type of
connector/socket pair is used widely in Japan and USA named as “SAE J1772/2009”
or Yazaeki connector (named after the manufacturer), found majorly in North
American Continent. Type 1 coupler is AC coupler which is compatible with only
single-phase power supply and doesn’t support three-phase supply. Thus, it can
be used in either of level 1 or level 2 charging. Level 1 charging uses 120V
with maximum current of 16 A with output power up to 2 kW. Level 2 uses 208V to
240V single phase with current maximum up to 30 A with power up to 7.4 kW. Type
1 coupler has five pins: three main bigger pins (two pins for AC supply, one
pin for earth), and last two smaller pins for compatibility functions like
proximity detection and pilot function control[16], [29] – [32], [38] – [41].
First small pin is
Proximity Pin (PP). It tells about the EVSE about the type of cable connected
to the socket as for different number of electrical currents, different
thickness cables are to be used. Second small pin is Control Pilot (CP). It is
responsible for bidirectional communication between EV and EVSE. It also checks
the amount of current the EV needs to charge the battery of EV. COMBO1 or CCS 1
type of connector coupler is derived from type 1 connector coupler.
B. Type 2 Connector
Types 2 connector/ socket pair is majorly
used in Europe,
was proposed by company named “Mennekes” thus named too after them. Type 2 couplers
can transfer higher power than type 1 counterpart thus can be used in both mode 2 and mode 3 charging. It is also compatible with three phases
along with single phase power supply. Therefore, maximum voltage can be up to 480V, and current up to 300A. COMBO 2 is derived from type 2 connector.
Type 2 coupler has 7 pins in total: five main pins (four pins as AC conductors, one pin for earth), two
pins for compatibility functions like proximity
detection (PP) and a pilot
function control (CP) as explained in type 1 connector [16], [29] – [32], [38] – [41].
DC-EV Connectors
The DC connectors are mostly found at the charging stations
and within the fleet chargers.
Rapid DC charging
rate starts from 50 kW, whereas ultra-fast charge at the rate of 100-150 kW or even range up to 350 kW. Just like AC connectors, DC connectors also vary across
different areas and
manufacturers.
C. CHAdeMO Connector
CHAdeMO was invented in Japan. “CHAdeMO” is an abbreviation of “CHArge
de MOve,” equivalent to “charge for moving,” and is a pun for “O cha demo ikaga desuka.”
In Japanese, meaning
“Let’s have a cup of tea while charging.” [42] It is official
DC charger connector
in Japan for fast charging and used by Nissan and Mitsubishi in North America.
The original CHAdeMO
connector can transfer
62.5 kW power through DC current through
2 pins held side by side. It can work at 500 V, and 125 A. New version
CHAdeMO 2.0 can work at much higher than previous
version, it can work at 1000V and 400A at maximum power of 400 kW. The data signals
are transferred using the CAN (Control Area Network) protocol
which is used as CP and communicates between EV and charging system. Level of battery before and during charging and maximum capacity of battery are few points communicated between EV and charging
station. It is not feasible
for EV to charge on DC all the time, so there is need to supply
AC charging to EV. Therefore, combined charging system
is developed[16], [29] – [32], [38], [39].
D. Combined Charging System Connector (CCS)
As the name suggests, combined
charging system connector,
consists of both DC and AC connectors. CHAdeMO is combines with both Type 1 and Type 2 to result
in CCS 1 (COMBO 1) and CCS 2 (COMBO 2) respectively. CCS 1 is used majorly
in North America
whereas; CCS 2 is most
widely used in EU, Asia [39]. Over the mains,
the communication protocol changes to internet protocol i.e., the charger
communicates through IP data. The CCS connector means that EV is compatible with both AC EVSE through top half of CCS and
DC charger through
bottom half of CCS connector.
COMBO 1 and COMBO 2 can be used in mode 2, mode 3 and in mode 4 by using part
function and complete unit as per needs of the user [16], [29] – [32], [38],
[39].
E.
GB/T Connector
The largest share in
EV market is held by China and the charging connector named GB/T (Guobiao
standard) is different from whole of the world and is available in both AC and
DC mode. AC-GB/T is effectively an inverse of type 2 charger connector, as
connector on cable side is female connector and, on the EV, socket is male in
type 2 charger and in GB/T connector on cable side is male connector and on the
EV socket is female. Type 2 charger uses PP/CP (proximity pilot and control
pilot) whereas GB/T uses CC/CP (charging confirmation and control pilot)
signals. Though connector is seven-pin interface and is capable of handling
three-phase supply, but the implementation is mostly limited to single-phase
supply. In the DC-GB/T total of nine pins are present. Two are for mains (DC+
and DC-), two for charging communication (S+ and S-), and two for charging confirmation
(CC1 and CC2), one for protective earth (PE) and last two pins for auxiliary DC
power (A+ and A-). DC- GB/T can easily work at high voltage of 750-1000V with
current of 80/125/200/250A [43] – [45].
F. Tesla
Connector
Over a short
period of time, Tesla has become the hot selling brand of EV. The Tesla EVs
have fast speed and long-distance range for which the Tesla EV battery also
needs to be extraordinary powerful. For the same reason, Tesla has designed
special EV charger connector to charge the EV. The charger connector has both
AC and DC supply unit from the single charging connector, but the designs are
divided into two types, Tesla Type 1 for North America, and Tesla Type 2 for
European Union. For communication between EV and charger, Tesla connector also
use CAN protocol just like CHAdeMO. It can also switch to digital protocol
instead of analog protocol. As per the recent developments, the Tesla is
shifting to type 2 models from type 1 model to maintain the uniformity all
around [45] – [47]. All standardized EV charging Connectors are overviewed in
Fig. 8.
Conclusion
In this paper, different
types of EV and EV charging methods have been presented. The EVs are classified
based on range, charging and combination of battery and engine/motor used. The
EV chargers are classified into conductive and inductive charging depending
upon the connection of charger to the EV. In
conductive charging the EV is connected using the cable and
inductive charging EMF is used to transfer the charge without any contact
between EV and charger. Further the charging levels are explained followed by
charging modes. Lastly the different charging connectors are presented.
References
[1]
“World Energy Outlook 2022.” [Online]. Available: www.iea.org/t&c/
[2] "Subject: Inclusion of Electric Vehicle
section on Ministry of Power Website-reg,”
2021. [Online].Available:www.investbihar.co.in/Download/Draft_for_e_vechile.pdf
[3]
“Global EV Outlook
2021 accelerating ambitions
despite the pandemic.” [Online]. Available: www.iea.org/t&c/
[4]
“Home - Bureau of Indian
Standards.” https://www.bis.gov.in/ (accessed Jan. 23, 2023).
[5] “Standards And Specifications.” https://e-amrit.niti.gov.in/standards-and-specifications (accessed Jan. 23, 2023).
[6]
B. Scrosati, J. Garche, and W. Tillmetz, Advances in Batterytechnology for Electric Vehicles. CRC Press.
[7]
“SAE International- Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, SAE-1772”.
[8] “Amendment 1 (07/2021) To AIS-038 (Rev. 2): Specific Requirements for Electric Power Train of Vehicles Substitute
following text for existing text: 1.1 Part I: Safety requirements with respect
to the electric power train of motor vehicles of categories M a,” 2021.
[9] Plugs, socket-outlets, vehicle connectors and vehicle inlets
- conductive charging
of electric vehicles.
[10] D. S. Dobrzynski and J. D. Harper, “Development and Implementation of SAE J2953 for AC Charging,” SAE Int J Passeng
Cars Electron Electr
Syst, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2014, doi: 10.4271/2014-01-0184.
[11] “Electric vehicle recharging infrastructure for on-road
EVs Prepared for BAA, Heathrow
Airport Limited by Sustainable Transport
Solutions (STS).” [Online]. Available: http://www.beama.org.uk/.
[12] B. Lunz and D. U. Sauer, “Electric
road vehicle battery charging systems and infrastructure,” in Advances in Battery
Technologies for Electric Vehicles, Bruno Scrosati,
Jürgen Garche, and Werner Tillmetz,
Eds. Elsevier, 2015, pp. 445–467. doi: 10.1016/B978-1- 78242-377-5.00017-0.
[13] H. Yang, Y. Gao, K. B. Farley, M. Jerue, J. Perry, and Z. Tse, “EV
Usage and City Planning of Charging Station Installations,” in Wireless Power
Transfer Conference (WPTC),
2015 IEEE : date 13- 15
May 2015., 2015.
[14] H. Zhang, Z. Hu, Z. Xu, and Y. Song, “An Integrated Planning Framework
for Different Types of PEV Charging Facilities in Urban Area,” IEEE
Trans Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2273–2284, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2436069.
[15] M. Aziz, “Advanced Charging System for Plug-in Hybrid
Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric
Vehicles,” in Hybrid Electric
Vehicles, InTech, 2017.
doi: 10.5772/intechopen.68287.
[16] M. Yilmaz and P. T. Krein, “Review of battery charger
topologies, charging power levels,
and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid
vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 28, no. 5. pp. 2151–2169, 2013. doi:
10.1109/TPEL.2012.2212917.
[17] M. Gjelaj, C. Træholt, S. Hashemi, and P. B. Andersen, Optimal Design of DC Fast-Charging Stations for EVs in Low Voltage Grids. IEEE, 2017.
[18]
O. M. Govardhan, “Fundamentals and Classification of Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 194–198, 2017, [Online].
Available: http://www.ijetjournal.org
[19]
G. Hiermann, R. F. Hartl, J. Puchinger, and T. Vidal, “Routing a mix of conventional, plug-in hybrid, and
electric vehicles,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 235–248,
Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.025.
[20]
X. Shi, J. Pan, H. Wang, and H. Cai, “Battery electric
vehicles: What is the minimum
range required?,” Energy, vol. 166, pp. 352–358, Jan. 2019,
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.056.
[21]
A. NUR, “An Overview Of Battery Electric Vehicles And Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” International Journal Of Advances
On Automotive And Technology, vol. 1, no. 2,
pp. 79–82, 2017, doi: 10.15659/ijaat.17.04.527.
[22]
A. Naziris, A. Frances, R. Asensi, and J. Uceda, “Black-box
small- signal structure for
single-phase and three-phase electric vehicle
battery chargers,” IEEE Access,
vol. 8, pp. 170496–170506, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024534.
[23]
S. Habib, M. M. Khan,
F. Abbas, L. Sang, M. U. Shahid,
and H. Tang, “A Comprehensive Study of Implemented International Standards, Technical Challenges, Impacts and Prospects for Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Access, vol. 6. Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Inc., pp. 13866–13890, Mar. 05, 2018. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2812303.
[24]
H. V. Nguyen,
D. du To, and D. C. Lee, “Onboard Battery
Chargers for Plug-in
Electric Vehicles with Dual Functional
Circuit for Low-
Voltage Battery Charging
and Active Power Decoupling,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 70212–70222, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876645.
[25]
J. Yuan, L. Dorn-Gomba, A. D. Callegaro, J. Reimers, and A. Emadi, “A review of bidirectional on-board chargers for electric vehicles,”
IEEE Access, vol. 9. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Inc., pp. 51501–51518, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069448.
[26]
T. Chen et al., “A
Review on Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
Development in the UK,” Journal of Modern Power Systems
and Clean Energy, vol. 8, no. 2. State Grid Electric
Power Research Institute, pp. 193–205, Mar. 01, 2020. doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2018.000374.
[27]
E. M. Szumska,
“Electric Vehicle Charging
Infrastructure along Highways
in the EU,” Energies (Basel), vol.
16, no. 2, p. 895, Jan. 2023, doi:
10.3390/en16020895.
[28]
M. R. Khalid, I. A. Khan, S. Hameed, M. S. J. Asghar, and J. S. Ro, “A Comprehensive Review
on Structural Topologies, Power Levels, Energy Storage Systems, and Standards for Electric Vehicle
Charging Stations and Their
Impacts on Grid,” IEEE Access,
vol. 9. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Inc., pp. 128069–128094,
2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112189.
[29]
M. Gjelaj, C. Traeholt,
S. Hashemi, and P. B. Andersen, “DC Fast- Charging Stations for EVs
Controlled by a Local Battery Storage in Low Voltage Grids,” in IEEE
Manchester PowerTech, Manchester UK, 2017.
[30]
G. Caneponi, F. Cazzato, M. di Clerico,
S. Cochi, M. C. Falvo, and M. Manganelli, “EVs Charging Stations
in Active Distribution Grids: A Real Case-Study of Smart Integration,” in 2016 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and
Motion (SPEEDAM), Capri,
Italy, 2016, pp.
1133–1137.
[31]
P. Mastny, J. Moravek, and M. Vrana, “Concept of Fast
Charging Stations with Integrated
Accumulators – Assessment of the Impact for
Operation,” in 2016 17th International
Scientific Conference onElectric Power Engineering (EPE), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016,
pp. 1–6.
[32]
A. K. Singh, M. K. Pathak, and Y. S. Rao, A new two-stage converter
with reduction of DC-link capacitor
for plug-in electric
vehicle battery charger. 2017.
[33]
A. Gilbert and J. Barrett,
“Wireless Charging: The Future of Electric
Vehicles,” in Advanced Microsystems for Automotive
Applications 2012. Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 49–56.
[34]
M. Kesler, “Wireless Charging of Electric Vehicles,” in 2018 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), Montreal, QC,
Canada, 2018, pp. 1–4.
[35]
C. Liu, D. J. Thrimawithana, G. A. Covic, and M. Kesler, “Active
Impedance control for inductive charging
of electric vehicles,” in2020 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer, WoW 2020, Nov. 2020, pp. 16–20. doi:
10.1109/WoW47795.2020.9291286.
[36]
C. T. Rim, “Wireless Charging
of Electric Vehicles,” in Power
Electronics Handbook, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 1113–1137. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811407-0.00038-6.
[37]
A. Pevere, R. Petrella, C. C. Mi, and S. Zhou, “Design of a
high efficiency 22 kW wireless
power transfer system
for EVs fast contactless charging stations Alessandro,” in 2014 IEEE
International Electric Vehicle
Conference (IEVC) 17-19 Dec. 2014,
Florence, Italy.
[38]
D. Dobrzański and P. Lubelska, “Overview And Characteristics of The EV Fast Charging
Connector Systems,” Maszyny Elektryczne-
Zeszyty Problemowe Nr,
vol. 3, no. 115, 2017.
[39]
M. Bayati, M. Abedi, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “A new electric
vehicle charging station
based on pulse current charging
method,” in 2017 Iranian
Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Tehran, Iran, 2017,
pp. 967–972.
[40]
“Electric Vehicle AC Charging Cables,
Type 1 & Type 2 - Volex.” https://www.volex.com/our-products/electric-vehicle-charging-
solutions/electric-vehicle-ev-ac-charging-cables/ (accessed Jan. 20, 2023).
[41]
“AC Type 1 EV Socket - EV Charger OEM.”
https://evsepower.com/index.php/ev-sockets-adapters/ac-type-1-ev- socket/
(accessed Jan. 20, 2023).
[42]
“FAQ | CHAdeMO.” https://www.chademo.com/faq
(accessed Jan. 24, 2023).
[43]
“GBT EV Charging Plug.” https://www.ag-elec.com/gbt-ev-
charging/ (accessed Jan. 27, 2023).
[44]
“EXCEL|MATE CC Electric
car charging coupler.”
[Online]. Available: www.amphenolpcd.com.cn
[45]
J. A. Sanguesa, V. Torres-Sanz, P. Garrido, F. J. Martinez, and J. M. Marquez-Barja,
“A review on electric vehicles: Technologies and challenges,” Smart Cities, vol. 4, no. 1. MDPI, pp. 372–404,
Mar. 01, 2021. doi: 10.3390/smartcities4010022.
[46]
H. Lee, H. K. School, and A. Clark,
“Charging the Future: Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle
Adoption Faculty Research Working Paper Series,” 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/research-
insights/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_types%3A121
[47]
J. Bae✝, K. Yongone, J.-Y. Bae✝and,
and Y. Kimone, “Tesla (TESLA) Electric Vehicle Core Technology Trend The Core
Technical Trends of TESLA Electric Vehicle (EV) Motors,” The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Power Electronics, vol.
22, no. 5, 2017, doi: 10.6113/TKPE.2017.22.5.414.