Abstract
Diesel pumps are currently the backbone of the irrigation system on which Indian agriculture relies. Operating diesel pumps costs a lot of money, but they are very polluting. Hence, solar irrigation pumps (SIPs) are a better alternative to diesel pumps. This paper elaborates on the SIP installation and its effects on farmers. Solar irrigation pumps were considered to have economic benefits if calculated by the replacement of fuel costs spent on diesel pumps. The fate of India's irrigation system will change substantially by using solar energy, resulting in reduced carbon emissions and decreased fuel costs, as well as energy independence. In the present paper, economic and environmental analyses have been done on the use of diesel pumps and solar pumps for irrigation. The case study has been done for the Indian agricultural system based on the data provided by the government authority. The impact on carbon emissions has been observed because it is a limiting factor for the sustainable growth of a country
INDEX TERMS: Solar Irrigation pumps, sustainable agriculture, diesel pump, renewable energy.
1. Introduction
Agriculture
is regarded as the backbone of the Indian economy, with irrigation playing a
pivotal role in ensuring productivity. Nowadays, a considerable number of
farmers are using diesel pumps for irrigation, resulting in a high operational
cost and environmental degradation. With India's aspirations towards renewable
energy, solar irrigation pumps
Since the sizes of their land are generally small, together with the
great costs of obtaining the inputs, this becomes more affecting for small and
marginal farmers.
Solar is also the
favorite due to its abundant availability almost everywhere, even in remote
areas, eliminating the need to burn diesel to power a water pump. Given the
electricity shortages and soaring diesel prices, they exert great influence
over the pumping demand of the urban water supply and irrigation. Consequently,
solar power is the best alternative to conventional water pumps, which are
highly dependent on electricity and diesel to operate.
Solar irrigation pumps (SIPs) have become a potential
solution for irrigation systems with regard to diesel and electricity-powered
pump sets, especially in developing countries
Agriculture is a very significant part of the Indian
economy; it provides sustenance to over 50 percent of India's population and
also contributes 17 to 18 % to the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
(India Economic Survey).
The problems of water scarcity and availability for agriculture are
critical in most developing countries. One mover behind the visions is the need
to use highly innovative mechanisms to reduce water and electricity consumption
and improve production. Among these innovations are solar photovoltaic (PV)
water-pumping systems, which provide a very viable option by being
cost-competitive and environmentally friendly as well as energy secure.
This is also where India leans hardest on groundwater
for irrigation, with some estimate 32 million pumps run on diesel, electricity,
and solar energy. Subsidised electricity, therefore, helps push farmers toward
using electric pumps, even as electrification continues to spread and diesel
prices climb. And on its own, the government subsidy has, in a way, already
played a sizable role in getting irrigation pumps in place for farmers, either
for smallholders to manage directly or for them to use themselves.
It would kind of speed up how quickly SIPs spread, help increase the
country's agricultural output, and also improve environmental conditions.
Electricity shortages and rising diesel costs mostly govern the need for water
pumping in the urban water supply and irrigation across Bangladesh. To work
around these issues, solar power for water pumping looks like the best
alternative compared with the older setups that rely on grid electricity or
diesel. For some time, developmental actors have been pushing for the diffusion
of solar-powered irrigation technologies, because it should be more reliable in
practice.
Such a transition is going to be useful for DISCOMs and
farmers in meeting the irrigation demand and lessening dependence on
utility-procured power. When a pump is idle, a grid-connected solar pump can
send the solar-harvested electricity back to the grid, which can generate an additional
source of income. Along with this, there is a need to strengthen the economic
aspects in the adjoining area of grid-connected SIPs under component C of the
PM KUSUM scheme for making the agriculture sector financially sustainable.
Most developing countries, such as India and Sub-Saharan
Africa, have already recognized solar-pumped irrigation as a climate-smart
technology that satisfies the increasing demand for irrigation
The study is based on secondary research from government reports, case studies, and Data on diesel pump usage, solar pump adoption benefits, and diesel cost. Comparisons were collected from various sources, including agricultural departments and renewable energy agencies. Farmers' feedback was also analyzed to understand the practicality of implementing SIPs. In assessing the economic viability of solar irrigation, the amount spent on diesel fuel consumed by a 15HP engine is considered. The diesel pumps, when switched over to solar irrigation pumps, benefited the farmers by saving their cost on diesel, which was the economic benefit derived.
The
carbon emission reduction, marking an environmental edge in solar irrigation
pumps, has been assessed here. To determine the carbon emission reduction, the
amount of diesel saved for irrigation was first quantified with the application
of the relation given below.
15 HP diesel pump set = 3.2 per Litre hour consumed diesel
1 liter diesel = 2.6 kg CO2 emission
1 kg CO2 = 0.27 kg carbon
According
to the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare available data ( on July
2024) total Agriculture Land in India is 219158000 Hectare ( 219.15 million
hectares), is a significant portion of irrigation in India still relies on
diesel pump sets, with estimates suggesting that around 80% of
installed irrigation pump horsepower in India is powered by
diesel; meaning a large majority of irrigation pumps in the country are
diesel-powered. In 80% diesel pump sets, it means 175.32 million hectares
of land irrigated by diesel pumps
III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
However,
the average area for which these operations were performed (Paddy, Wheat,
Barley, Bajra, Groundnut, Lentils, Sugarcane, and Maize cultivation) is about
0.40 hectares for each of them. In Table 1, Diesel consumption during
irrigation was discussed concerning the total area under crops such as Paddy,
Wheat, Barley, Bajra, Groundnut, Lentils, Sugarcane, Maize, and Groundnut
through these 15 HP Diesel Pumps. In irrigating an area of one hectare, a 15 HP
diesel pumping unit shall take approximately 6 hours. The average diesel
consumption was estimated to be 3.20 Liters per hour by the 15 HP diesel
pumping unit during the periods of study, and diesel was estimated to cost
92.37 per Litre during the study period. The respondent farmers stated 36
irrigations for paddy in the study area. The area allotted by the sample
farmers for paddy was estimated to be 0.16 Hectares per farm; therefore, the
quantity of diesel needed to irrigate 0.16 Hectares of paddy amounted to 73.72 litres
in the study area. Therefore, farmers spent a total of `6,809.51 rupees on
diesel used for irrigating the paddy crop at `92.37 per Litre. (see Table No.
-1 )
We know that,
A 15 HP diesel pump set =
3.2 liters per hour consumed diesel
Total
diesel consumption per hectare = 15 HP diesel pump set running in 1 hour. × Time required per irrigation × No. of irrigation
= 3.20×4×36
= 460.8 Liter /Hectare
Diesel consumption of paddy farm = Total
diesel consumption per hectare × area of farm
= 460.8 × 0.16
= 73.72 Liter
Total cost of
Diesel in the paddy farm = Diesel consumption of the paddy farm ×Current cost
of diesel
=73.72×92.37
= 6809.51 Rupees
TABLE -1 . Diesel Consumption (in Litres) , CO2 and Carbon emitting (into the atmosphere) of the Total Agricultural Area Irrigation by 15- Horsepower diesel engine pump set in Arming Crops
Similarly, all crops
from the calculation are the same Under the study, wheat sample farming was
given six irrigations during the crop
period. The total wheat cultivated area
by normal farmers in the study area was estimated to be 1.00 hectares per farm.
As a result, farmers had to burn 153.6 Liters of diesel to irrigate 1.00
hectares of wheat during the growing season of the crop by using 15 HP diesel
pumps. The total expenditure incurred on diesel used for irrigating the wheat
crop was 14188 rupees. (see table no 1.)
The
estimated total area allocated by sample farmers for Barley cultivation in the
study area was 0.41 hectares per farm. Sample farmers irrigated a barley crop
in a complete life-cycle by means of six irrigations and provided to the barley
crop, which would require eight hours of running a diesel pump to irrigate a
0.41-hectare area of the wheat crop, a total diesel consumption of 62.97
Liters. Hence, the cost of diesel used for barley irrigation is at a rate
of 92.37 per Liter is 5816.53 rupees.
(see table no -1 )
About six irrigations were being provided by sample
farmers to the bajra crops in a season. It was revealed that farmers allot 0.99
hectares of area for bajra cultivation per farm. With a 15 HP diesel pump,
152.06 Liters of diesel were used in the irrigation of about 0.99 hectares of
barley crop. The diesel cost at Rs. 92.37 per Liter thus comes to Rs. 14045.78
for the bajra. (see Table No. -1 )
The total area put
aside by the sample farmers in the study area for groundnut cultivation was
estimated to be close to 0.70 hectares for each farm. Sample farmers were
irrigating groundnut crops six times during the complete life-cycle, and they
needed to supply one irrigation to groundnut crops that must be run by using a
diesel pump for about eight hours. So, the total amount of diesel used to
irrigate this 0.70-hectare area of the groundnut crop was 107.52 Liters.
Accordingly, the total cost of diesel at the rate of 92.37 litres for the irrigation
of wheat comes to 9931.61 rupees. (see table no 1)
A total area of 0.20 ha was estimated for lentil
cultivation by the normal farmers in the study area. The sample farmers used to
irrigate the Masoor crop thrice during its entire life cycle and provide one
irrigation to the Lentils crop, shall run a diesel engine pump set for 4 hours.
Therefore, the total diesel consumption for the irrigation of Lentils has been
accounted for at 7.68 litres for irrigating 0.20 ha of area. Thus, the total
price of diesel used for lentil irrigation works out to be Rs. 709.4. (see the
table no. 1), at the rate of `92.37 per Litre.
The overall area allotted for sugarcane cultivation by the sample
farmers in the study is around 0.16 hectares per farm. Sample farmers irrigated
the sugarcane crop 12 times during the entire growing season and, in addition,
provided irrigation to the sugarcane crop, which requires running the diesel
pump for about eight hours. The total diesel consumed for irrigating.
0.16 hectares of sugarcane crop is 49.15 Liters, hence the total
cost of diesel used for wheat irrigation at the rate of 92.37
per Litre is 4539.98. (see table
no -1 )
For maize cultivation,
the total area allocated by the sample farmers in the study area was estimated
as 0.16 hectares per farm. Irrigation for the maize crop during its entire life-cycle
was carried out 9 times by the sample farmers, where one irrigation required
the operation of a diesel pump for 8 hours. Therefore, the total diesel used to
irrigate an area of 0.16 hectares for the maize crop was 36.86 Liters.
Therefore, the total cost of diesel used for irrigation during the maize crop
at the rate of ` 92.37 per Litre comes to 3404.75. (see Table No. 1)
From
the findings above, it was evident that if 15 HP diesel irrigation pump was
used in irrigating 0.16 hectares of Paddy, 1 hectare of Wheat, 0.41 hectares of
Barley, 0.99 hectares of Bajra, 0.70 hectares of Groundnut, 0.20 hectares of
Masoor, 0.16 hectares of Sugarcane, and 0.16 hectares of Maize cultivation, it
would amount to a total diesel consumption of 643.56 Liters for each farm. This
means the farmer had to spend 59442.65 on irrigation in one year. With the
respondents currently not employing any diesel irrigation pumps, there was no
diesel consumption for irrigation. Thus, the diesel savings accruing to each
farmer would be `59442.65. It would also mean that using solar irrigation pumps
for irrigation instead of diesel irrigation pumps each year saved 643.56 Liters
of diesel per farm. (see the table no. 1).
B.
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF SOLAR
IRRIGATION PUMP SET
The adoption of solar pumps for irrigation has rendered
an environmentally friendly effect through carbon emission reduction from the
use of diesel pumps for irrigation purposes. Thus, carbon emission reduction
was estimated by first converting the savings of diesel on irrigation into kg
of Co2 and then converting the amount of carbon dioxide
corresponding to the amount of carbon. Thus, Table 2 presents diesel
consumption, Co2, and carbon emissions per hectare of Paddy, Barley,
Wheat, Bajra, Groundnut, Masoor, Sugarcane, and Maize cultivation by a 15 HP
diesel irrigation pump.
The
paddy crop used 460.8 Liters of diesel for the irrigation of one hectare per
season. The burning of diesel released 1,198.08 kg of CO2 into the atmosphere;
thus, only 323.48 kg of carbon would be released into the atmosphere from paddy
(see Table No. 2).
We know that,
1 liter diesel = 2.6 kg CO2
emission
1 kg CO2 = 0.27 kg carbon.
CO2 emission of Paddy
farm = Total diesel consumption in 1 hectare × 1 litre diesel generates CO2
emission
= 460.8*2.6
=1198.08 Kg CO2 emission
Carbon emission of paddy
farm = CO2 emission of Paddy farm×1 kg CO2
= 1198.08 * 0.27
=
323.48 kg carbon
Similarly, all crops from the calculation are the same. For one
hectare of wheat, the operation of the 15 HP diesel irrigation pump consumed
153.6 Liters of diesel. With such operation, the pump produces 399.36 kg of
carbon dioxide, hence releasing 107.82 kg of carbon to the environment (see
Table -2 ).
The irrigation of one hectare of barley surface would consume approximately 153.6 litres of diesel for the entire season. Pollution simply by burning this much additional diesel would mean an extra 399.36 Kg of carbon dioxide emission into the atmosphere, and from that, 107.82 Kg of this carbon could have been emitted directly into the atmosphere by barley only. ((see the Table 2 ).
TABLE
2. Diesel Consumption (in Litres) , CO2
and Carbon emissions (into the atmosphere) of the Total Agricultural Area
Irrigation by a 15-horsepower diesel engine pump set in Arming Crops
|
Area of farm (Hectare) |
No. of irrigations |
Irrigation time (hour/hectare) |
Diesel required per hectare (Liters/hectare) |
Diesel Consumption in Liters |
The total cost of diesel is ₹92.37per Liter |
||
|
Paddy |
0.16 |
36 |
4 |
460.8 |
73.72 |
6809.51 |
|
|
Wheat |
1.00 |
6 |
8 |
153.6 |
153.6 |
14188.08 |
|
|
Barley |
0.41 |
6 |
8 |
153.6 |
62.97 |
5816.53 |
|
|
Bajra |
0.99 |
6 |
8 |
153.6 |
152.06 |
14045.78 |
|
|
Groundnut |
0.70 |
6 |
8 |
153.6 |
107.52 |
9931.62 |
|
|
Lentils |
0.20 |
3 |
4 |
38.4 |
7.68 |
709.40 |
|
|
Sugarcane |
0.16 |
12 |
8 |
307.2 |
49.15 |
4539.98 |
|
|
Maize
Cultivation |
0.16 |
9 |
8 |
230.4 |
36.86 |
3404.75 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
1651.2 |
643.56 |
59442.65 |
|
|
Crop |
Irrigation by diesel engine pump set (hectare) |
Diesel Consumption in Million Liters |
Total CO2 in tons |
Total carbon emitting in the Air (tons) |
|
Paddy |
38262400 |
17600.7 |
4576182 |
1235569.14 |
|
Wheat |
25466400 |
3911.6 |
1017016 |
274594.32 |
|
Barley |
440800 |
67.7 |
17602 |
4752.54 |
|
Bajra |
525520 |
80.7 |
20982 |
5665.14 |
|
Groundnut |
376000 |
57.7 |
15002 |
40.50 |
|
1136000 |
43.6 |
11336 |
3060.72 |
|
|
sugarcane |
4888000 |
1501.5 |
39039 |
10540.53 |
Maize |
696000 |
160.3 |
41678 |
11253.06 |
|
Total- |
71791120 |
|
|
|
In lentils, the
total area under crops was about 113600 hectares in India. Irrigation of 113600
hectares of area through 15 HP diesel pumps would consume about 43.6 million
Liters of diesel. That would produce 11336 tons of carbon dioxide, which means
3060.72 tons of carbon emitted in the atmosphere per year (See Table 3)
The total area under crops in India for sugarcane was
4888000 hectares. To irrigate an area of 4888000 hectares with 15 HP diesel
pumps, a total of 1501.5 million Liters of diesel will be required as fuel.
This would generate an emission of 39039 tons of carbon dioxide, leading to
yearly air emission of 10540.53 tons of carbon (See Table 3)
The overall area of crop land under maize was over 696000
hectares in India. To irrigate this area of 696000 hectares, a 15 HP diesel
pump set would consume 160 million Liters of diesel as fuel. This would produce
41678 tons of carbon dioxide, leading to the atmospheric emission of 11253.06
tons of carbon every year. (See Table no
3)
Conclusion
The replacement of diesel engine pumps set with solar irrigation pumps is a sustainable
approach to agricultural irrigation in India. While initial costs are a
challenge, long-term benefits in terms of cost savings, energy efficiency, and
environmental sustainability make SIPs a promising solution. Government
initiatives and farmer awareness programs are crucial for the widespread
adoption of solar irrigation technology. The study found that when irrigating
one hectare each of Paddy, Wheat, Barley, Bajra, Groundnut, Lentils, Sugarcane,
and Maize cultivation with 15 HP diesel irrigation pumps, 1651.2 Liters of
diesel were consumed, resulting in the emission of 4293.12 tons of Co2
into the atmosphere. Therefore, the total carbon emission was calculated to be
1159.14 Kg per hectare. If the 71791120-hectare area were irrigated with 15 HP
diesel irrigation pumps for Paddy, Wheat, Barley, Bajra, Groundnut, Lentils,
Sugarcane, and Maize cultivation, it would consume 23423.8 million Liters of
diesel for operating the diesel engine pump set. This, in turn, would release
5738837 tons of carbon dioxide, thus annually contributing 1545475.95 tons of
carbon into the atmosphere. If solar irrigation pumps were to replace such
diesel irrigation pumps in India on a large scale, the country would benefit in
the international market.
References
[1] V. A. Ani, M.
Abdullahi, and I. F. Okafor, “Solar-powered water solutions for sustainable
irrigation in rural communities,” Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 10, Apr.
2026, doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2026.1804406.
[2] A.
Narayanamoorthy, R. Suresh, P. Jothi, and K. S. Sujitha, “Solar-powered
irrigation pumps in South India: do farmers really benefit?,” Water Policy,
vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1293–1308, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.2166/wp.2025.106.
[3] V. K.
Hebsale Mallappa and R. Bansal, “Economic feasibility and farmers’ willingness
to adopt solar-powered irrigation pumps (SPIPs) for self-reliance,” Energy
Strategy Reviews, vol. 64, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2026.102094.
[4] R. R. Kanna,
M. Baranidharan, R. Raja Singh, and V. Indragandhi, “Solar Energy Application
in Indian Irrigation System,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and
Engineering, IOP Publishing Ltd, Oct. 2020. doi:
10.1088/1757-899X/937/1/012016.
[5] M. U.
Salehin, J. I. Joy, S. W. Hasan, M. J. Babui, and F. Khan, “Utilization of
Solar Energy in Irrigation Systems in Bangladesh,” Energy Power Eng., vol. 15,
no. 12, pp. 468–481, 2023, doi: 10.4236/epe.2023.1512026.
[6] P. K. S.
Rathore, S. S. Das, and D. S. Chauhan, “Perspectives of solar photovoltaic
water pumping for irrigation in India,” Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 22, pp.
385–395, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.10.009.
[7] R. Parmar,
C. Banerjee, and A. K. Tripathi, “Performance Analysis of Cost Effective
Portable Solar Photovoltaic Water Pumping System,” Current Photovoltaic
Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2288–3274, 2021, doi: 10.21218/CPR.2021.9.2.051.
[8] W. Niyazi
Mustafa, Z. M. Abdullah, and B. A. Nasir, “Comprehensive Review On Solar
Induction Motor Water Pumping System For Irrigation Application,” 2026.
[9] M. Eldirdiri
Ali Khalfallah et al., “Comparison between Solar-Powered and Diesel-Driven
Water Pumping Systems for Oil-Palm Irrigation Plantations,” vol. 24, no. 3, pp.
131–137, 2024.
[10] G. Dadhich
and V. Shrivastava, “Economic comparison of solar PV and diesel water pumping
system,” in IEEE International Conference on Information, Communication,
Instrumentation and Control, ICICIC 2017, Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers Inc., Jul. 2017, pp. 1–6. doi:
10.1109/ICOMICON.2017.8279156.
[11] Y. Gautam,
“Economic and Environmental Benefits of Replacing Diesel Pumps with Solar
Irrigation Pumps in Jaipur, Rajasthan,” International Journal of Agriculture
Environment and Biotechnology, vol. 13, no. 4, Dec. 2020, doi:
10.30954/0974-1712.04.2020.12.
[12] Y. Gautam and
O. P. Singh, “Economic and environmental benefits of replacing 7 HP diesel
irrigation pumps with solar irrigation pumps in Rajasthan, India,” 2021.
[Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348917179
[13] R. Kumar, A.
Kumar, M. K. Gupta, J. Yadav, and A. Jain, “Solar tree-based water pumping for
assured irrigation in sustainable Indian agriculture environment,” Sustain.
Prod. Consum., vol. 33, pp. 15–27, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.013.
[14] E. Gupta,
“The impact of solar water pumps on energy-water-food nexus: Evidence from
Rajasthan, India,” Energy Policy, vol. 129, pp. 598–609, Jun. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.008.
[15] P. Santra, P.
Chandra Pande, P. Pande, A. Singh, and P. Kumar, “Solar PV Pumping System for
Irrigation Purpose and its Economic Comparison with Grid-Connected Electricity
and Diesel Operated Pumps,” Indian J. Econ. Dev., vol. 4, no. 4, 2016,
[Online]. Available: www.iseeadyar.org
[16] C. S. Guno,
“Diesel to Solar Irrigation System: Economic, Environmental, and Social
Acceptability Analyses by Small-Scale Farmers of Calapan, Oriental Mindoro,”
Journal of Human Ecology and Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, Feb. 2024,
doi: 10.56237/jhes23015.
[17] U. Kumar and
S. Nath, “Performance Evaluation of Irrigation Characteristics Operated by
Movable Solar Irrigation System Using Micro-irrigation Techniques in Hilly
Region of Uttarakhand,” National Academy Science Letters, 2026, doi:
10.1007/s40009-026-02081-2.
[18] N. I. Sarkar,
A. I. Sifat, N. Rahim, and S. M. S. Reza, “Replacing diesel irrigation pumps
with solar photovoltaic pumps for sustainable irrigation in Bangladesh: A
feasibility study with HOMER,” in 2nd International Conference on Electrical
Information and Communication Technologies, EICT 2015, Institute of Electrical
and Electronics Engineers Inc., Jan. 2016, pp. 498–503. doi:
10.1109/EICT.2015.7392004.
[19] A. P.
Choudhury, R. Rathod, and A. Yadav, “Insights from Farmer-Managed Decentralized
Solar Irrigation Systems,” in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Proceedings , Association for Computing Machinery, Apr. 2026. doi:
10.1145/3772363.3798971.
[20] A. Sharma,
“Environmental governance in rural India: diffusion of solar powered irrigation
technologies,” Forum Dev. Stud., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 225–245, 2021, doi:
10.1080/08039410.2021.1872699.
[21] S. R. Mantri,
R. S. Kasibhatla, and V. K. B. Chennapragada, “Grid-connected vs. off-grid
solar water pumping systems for agriculture in India: a comparative study,”
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, vol.
46, no. 1, pp. 6348–6362, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1745957.
[22] A. K. Thakur
et al., “Advancements in solar technologies for sustainable development of
agricultural sector in India: a comprehensive review on challenges and
opportunities,” Jun. 01, 2022, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland
GmbH. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20133-0.
[23] P. Santra,
“Performance evaluation of solar PV pumping system for providing irrigation
through micro-irrigation techniques using surface water resources in hot arid
region of India,” Agric. Water Manag., vol. 245, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106554.
[24] M. Tanashu et
al., “Predicting Solar Water Pump Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers in
Ethiopia: A Socioeconomic and Policy Modeling Approach,” Advances in
Agriculture, vol. 2026, no. 1, 2026, doi: 10.1155/aia/5580700.
[25] D. Varshney,
A. Mukherji, S. Shrestha, and L. P. Ghimire, “Solar irrigation in Nepal:
Subsidy design, farmer adoption, and utilization patterns,” Environmental
Research Letters, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ae2281.
[26] C. S. Guno
and C. B. Agaton, “Socio-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Solar
Irrigation Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Production,” Sustainability
(Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 11, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116834.
[27] P. A. P. H.
D. R. S. H. P. D. D. V. S. V. K. and A. M. P. G.V. Prajapati1*, “SOLAR PUMPS
FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: A STUDY ON ECONOMIC VIABILITY AND TECHNICAL
PERFORMANCE,” Plant Arch., vol. 25, no. SI, Jan. 2025, doi:
10.51470/plantarchives.2025.sp.ictpairs-123.
[28] S. Agrawal
and A. Jain, “Sustainable deployment of solar irrigation pumps: Key
determinants and strategies,” Mar. 01, 2019, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. doi:
10.1002/wene.325.
[29] S. Verma et
al., “Solar PV powered water pumping system - A review,” in Materials Today:
Proceedings, Elsevier Ltd, 2020, pp. 5601–5606. doi:
10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.434.
[30] O. A. Rozak,
H. Prasetyo, E. Sumarno, and J. T. Susilo, “Performance Analysis of 160WP Solar
Panels as an Energy Source for 125 Watt Irrigation Pumps,” Journal Renewable
Energy & Mechanics (REM), vol. 09, p. 2026, 2026, doi:
10.25299/rem.2026.26224.
[31] M. T. Islam
and M. E. Hossain, “Economic feasibility of solar irrigation pumps: A study of
northern bangladesh,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development,
vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.14710/IJRED.2022.38469.
[32] D. Varshney,
A. Mukherji, K. Sharma, A. Banerjee, and A. Sikka, “Solar irrigation and just
energy transitions in agriculture: Insights from evaluation of Gujarat’s SKY
program,” Energy Policy, vol. 210, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114999.
[33] P. Purohit,
“Financial evaluation of renewable energy technologies for irrigation water
pumping in India,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 3134–3144, Jun. 2007,
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.013.
[34] A. Chandra
and N. Brozović, “Shifting dynamics and environmental implications of the
irrigation pump market in India,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 12, 2024, doi:
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1398822.
[35] E. R.
Shouman, H. Ezz, and E. S. Bakhoum, “Economic analysis of the using of traditional
fuel and solar energy to power irrigation pumps in Egypt,” International
Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, vol. 38, pp. 87–99, 2018, doi:
10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.38.87.